|
How do you photograph something that does not emanate light, and even consumes it with its great gravity? What did we photographed exactly?
But more importantly, how did we do it? |
"Black holes ain't as black as they are painted. They are not the eternal prisons they were once thought. Things can get out of a black hole, both to the outside, and possibly to another universe. So if you feel you are in a black hole, don't give up. There's a way out."
Stephen Hawking, 'Reith Lecture 2 : Black holes ain’t as black as they are painted' (2015)
A black hole isn't an easy thing to photograph, being so dense that even light can’t escape their vicinity, which by definition, makes them invisible. So when the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) team released the first image of a black hole, what they really released was an image of the black hole’s event horizon — the minimum distance from the black hole’s center where gravity is still weak enough for light to escape.
And how they did it is nearly as impressive as the image itself. EHT scientists works researchers around the world to point their radio telescopes at a select group of black holes, then combined their individual observations to create one giant array the size of our planet. With this technique, they could use essentially the diameter of the Earth as the resolving power, that let them glimpse finer details than even the Hubble Space Telescope can.
Imaging A Monster
In 2017, the EHT turned its gaze to supermassive black holes at the centers of two galaxies: our own Milky Way, and another about 50 million light-years away called M87. Each of these astronomical monsters has a disk of matter swirling around the black hole. That material heats up and glows until it eventually falls in. By capturing an image of the glowing disk around M87’s black hole, and the dark inner edge caused by the black hole’s event horizon, scientists not only made history, but they expanded our knowledge of how black holes work.
So why haven’t astronomers done this earlier? Because it's an incredibly difficult feat. One of the biggest challenges is how tiny a target is. Supermassive black holes have a lot of mass, sure, but they’re super compact. The one in the center of our galaxy, called Sagittarius A* (Sgr A*), has an event horizon smaller across than the distance between the Sun and Earth. It’s roughly 26,000 light-years away and takes up a minuscule amount of sky – just a few billionths the width of the full moon. The black hole at the center of M87, on the other hand, is a whopping 1,000 times bigger than our own, but it also sits roughly 2,000 times farther away. So in Earth’s sky, it’s more or less the same size as Sgr A*. Of course, you need a powerful telescope to photograph either black hole.
Generally, the resolution of a telescope — how small of a target it can see — comes down to its size. The larger the telescope, the more resolving power it has, and the smaller the details it can make out. But even the largest telescopes in the world aren’t big enough to image these black holes.
And how they did it is nearly as impressive as the image itself. EHT scientists works researchers around the world to point their radio telescopes at a select group of black holes, then combined their individual observations to create one giant array the size of our planet. With this technique, they could use essentially the diameter of the Earth as the resolving power, that let them glimpse finer details than even the Hubble Space Telescope can.
Imaging A Monster
In 2017, the EHT turned its gaze to supermassive black holes at the centers of two galaxies: our own Milky Way, and another about 50 million light-years away called M87. Each of these astronomical monsters has a disk of matter swirling around the black hole. That material heats up and glows until it eventually falls in. By capturing an image of the glowing disk around M87’s black hole, and the dark inner edge caused by the black hole’s event horizon, scientists not only made history, but they expanded our knowledge of how black holes work.
So why haven’t astronomers done this earlier? Because it's an incredibly difficult feat. One of the biggest challenges is how tiny a target is. Supermassive black holes have a lot of mass, sure, but they’re super compact. The one in the center of our galaxy, called Sagittarius A* (Sgr A*), has an event horizon smaller across than the distance between the Sun and Earth. It’s roughly 26,000 light-years away and takes up a minuscule amount of sky – just a few billionths the width of the full moon. The black hole at the center of M87, on the other hand, is a whopping 1,000 times bigger than our own, but it also sits roughly 2,000 times farther away. So in Earth’s sky, it’s more or less the same size as Sgr A*. Of course, you need a powerful telescope to photograph either black hole.
Generally, the resolution of a telescope — how small of a target it can see — comes down to its size. The larger the telescope, the more resolving power it has, and the smaller the details it can make out. But even the largest telescopes in the world aren’t big enough to image these black holes.
|
Black Hole Photography 101
Radio astronomers get around this problem by linking together lots of smaller radio telescopes into a single array, where they effectively act as a single gigantic one. Each dish in the array collects light from a target object, like the glowing disk around a black hole, and converts the radio waves it receives into an electronic signal. They then used a computer called a correlator to combine all the electronic signals from the various dishes into what’s called an interference pattern. Finally, astronomers tapped a special kind of math (Fourier transforms for the curious) to decode that pattern, showing what the target would look like in the sky if our eyes could see in radio wavelengths. With an array of radio telescopes, it’s the distance between individual dishes, rather than the diameter of a single dish, that determines the array’s resolving power. The farther apart two dishes are, the better the resolving power of that array. That’s why radio observatories like the Very Large Array in New Mexico and the Atacama Large Millimeter Array in Chile can have dishes miles apart. But even these arrays aren’t big enough to resolve the tiny radio speck in the sky that is the supermassive black hole in the Milky Way, or the one in M87. |
|
|
So, to increase the resolution, astronomers combine data from telescopes in entirely different locations, using precise atomic clocks and GPS systems to carefully time the observations and keep everything in sync.
You can put your antennas anywhere on the Earth that you like. You can put one in Northern Canada, and put another in the Southern Chile. With those two antennas, you can kind of simulate or mimic a telescope with the diameter of the whole planet.” The EHT has taken that to a global scale to make a telescope as big as our entire planet. Radio telescopes in Arizona, Hawaii, Mexico, Chile, Spain, and even Antarctica all observed their black hole targets in tandem. With dishes spread as far as possible, the EHT aims for nothing less than the maximum resolution a radio array can get without leaving Earth. In general, the more pairs of antennas that you have, the better the image you'll get at the end of the day. That’s why this first black hole image is so impressive — and it’s just the first of many results we’ll soon see from the EHT. |
Ponder this
Since what the EHT captured is essentially light, where does the light come from if black holes neither emit nor reflect them?
Does the curvature of the Earth affect the EHT? How would they mitigate this?
Discuss
Discuss on the problems involving imaging a black hole. What are the factors involved on the black hole? What about here on Earth? What about the objects between the Earth and the black hole such as stars, cosmic dust, etc?
Further readings
The Event Horizon Telescope, a large telescope array consisting of a global network of radio telescopes.
EHT YouTube Channel, for videos of its operation and simulations.
